Search This Blog

Saturday, December 3, 2011

The Help - Kathryn Stockett




The Help, by Kathryn Stockett

I am hardly qualified to write an analysis of the way race relations are treated in Kathryn Stockett’s best-selling novel The Help. I’m a privileged white girl growing up in California in the 1990s/2000s, and I barely want to touch these issues with a ten foot pole. But given the extremes to which reviewers of The Help seem to go in their critiques, and having just read it myself (late to the party, as usual), I feel I have the right to say something, if not everything.

I’ve read other reviews, casual and official, good and bad, and everyone has something to say about it, whichever side they fall on. Maybe it’s different, listening to the audiobook than reading it myself, or maybe it’s because I’m not from the south and so everyone’s accents sound like some kind of stereotype to me, not just the voices of the African American characters, but the well-acted, well-read dialogue didn’t bother me as it seems to have bothered others.

Yes, this book had narrative problems. Oblivious and naïve as I may be, I too questioned certain plot points – why didn’t Skeeter, from her well-off and comfortable position, consider doing anything to help Yule Mae’s sons? Why didn’t she, or for that matter Minnie, make any kind of comment to the discomfort of the white lady taking credit for writing the book (when clearly Aibilene was just as competent to write it as Skeeter, and the stories weren’t Skeeter’s at all)? For that matter, why didn’t either Skeeter or Aibilene ever raise, even in their own minds, the issue of Aibilene doing all the work on the Miss Myrna columns the whole way through? It’s true that Skeeter, even from her position as the novel’s sole politically conscious voice, seemed curiously unaware of how she was taking advantage of Aibilene – at the very least, by the time they had become friends, Skeeter should have been rethinking how she exploited her friend’s maid in those earlier days of the column. I agree, too, with the common complaint that it makes no sense for Celia Foote to be so oblivious to the rules and boundaries regarding relations between white and black people, given that she is a white woman in Mississippi, even if she’s white trash. (If anything, she should be more aware of those lines and where her position is in relation to them.) In general, though, I was more disappointed with Celia’s plotline for its tight and easy ending, its total lack of going anywhere with the infertility issue – after the promise of that mimosa-chopping scene, and the tragedy of the miscarriage, to have everything conclude with “and we’re so grateful, you have a job with us forever, Minnie!” just felt easy and pat.

There are other issues, too, of a similar nature, but honestly, I enjoyed this book, and I really didn’t find it as problematic as many reviewers seemed to. For instance, I didn’t think that The Help divided its characters into black people = good people, white people = evil. I didn’t even think that those white characters who had done terrible things were particularly Baddies Are Bad – yes, Miss Hilly is a pretty dreadful person, but we are asked to like and almost to sympathize with Skeeter’s mother as well as with Stuart, and both of them have done bad things for bad reasons, both of them hold the typical views on race and both of them are simultaneously condemned and still liked by Skeeter – which just feels real to me. And the fact that we are, with Skeeter, asked to reconcile that liking of them with the disgust for what they believe is what prevents, for me, the Baddies Are Bad factor.

As for the critique that The Help portrays all the problems black women in the 60s had to deal with as catty gossip and petty backstabbing…that’s kind of ridiculous. I believe this critique was more focused on the movie, which I haven’t seen, so who knows? Maybe the film lightens the novel’s narrative considerably and eliminates all those references to lynchings, attacks, murders and maimings and unfair imprisonment and the total, absolute injustice these characters face… but the novel certainly does not pretend that the worst its black characters might have to contend with is social disgrace or petty gossip. Even at its best, the petty gossip can lead, the book informs us, to no longer being able to get a job, which itself means ruination of a family’s life – no food on the table, no way to support your children – and at the worst, there is murder, there is a black boy beaten to blindness, there is a woman put in prison for years for a crime she came nowhere near committing, there is absolutely reality here. The women who tell Skeeter their stories aren’t scared of being caught gossiping, and being embarrassed – they are scared that they and their families will be arrested, attacked, destroyed. How is that making light of the situation?

Leaving aside those issues, though, the book has some narrative flaws – like I said, the Celia plotline wrapped up far too neatly and easily for me, and furthermore, I was sick and tired of hearing oblique, menacing references to “that awful thing I done with the pie” when it was absolutely obvious from nearly the first moment exactly what it was Minnie done (the same problem goes for what Skeeter’s mother did to Constantine – with all the looming threats and mystery surrounding that incident, I was expecting a trifle more than what I got, and was just tired of the awkward, stilted phrasing used in both cases, to boot – that awful thing! That terrible thing! The horrible thing Mother did!). But for the most part, I can only say that I listened to those eighteen and a half hours in one weekend, turning it on every chance I got because I was intrigued, wrapped up in the slow, drawling world, dying to know what would happen next (even when what happened next turned out to be frustratingly trite). And really, that’s all I expected or asked for from The Help.


Saturday, October 8, 2011

A goat and a slinky

The Blogger profile asks you a random question. I tried to answer in my profile, the point of the darn thing, but it was too long. It's a blog post instead, now.

"You're trapped in a well with a goat and a slinky. Describe how you will escape."

Goats will eat anything (or so cartoons have told me). I get the goat to bite the slinky in half, put the two halves together to make a whole, put the hole in the wall of the well and tunnel upwards, with the goat eating the dirt as we climb. After our escape, the goat and I become celebrities as well as bosom buddies, until we have an epic falling out over the issue of an interview the goat has done with the New York Post on the subject of our Miracle Tunnel Escape, in which the goat takes full credit for my escape plan. We are eventually reconciled in a surprisingly touching, often-played-in-reruns episode of the Daily Show. Our relationship is stronger than ever, and I will be named godmother to the goat's first and fourth kids.



In unrelated news,
Don't talk to me about a man's being able to talk sense; everyone can talk sense. Can he talk nonsense?
William Pitt 

All the things...

One of my goals for this (school) year was to cook/food prep more. I haven't gotten off to a very good start, but yesterday I made lunch - sauteed broccoli & cauliflower with truffle oil & dried rosemary, with a handful of cherry tomatoes & some almonds - and this morning I made a smoothie out of kale, a Shingo pear, half an avocado, some almond milk & the spiciest fresh ginger I've ever eaten. And both were delicious. Too delicious to wait and take pictures. Oops.

Other life things right now include that I took the GRE this afternoon and while I won't get my real scores back for a while, because I took the revised one, the estimate given based on the old paper-based version was 700-800 verbal and 530-630 math, which I'm okay with because hey, I really legit didn't study so I can't really expect better. Do hope my essays were decent.

Now I need to focus on all the things, allllll the things, and fit into that choosing what grad programs to apply for, and getting letters of rec, and and and and and.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Booktracks

This is my first attempt to post via the new Blogger iPod app, so forgive me any issues...the keyboard doesn't rotate, so my typing is more awkward than usual.

So- just downloaded my first Booktrack!! It's an app (also just online I believe, not only app) that is essentially an ebook that has a soundtrack. I got Sherlock Holmes and the Speckled Band, it's the only story available on the iPod at the moment that isn't a kids fairy tale. However, they said more titles are forthcoming... Including Pride and Prejudice - excited for that, of course!

It's not an audiobook-- in the sense of someone reading the story to you. It plays a soundtrack of musical underscoring and light sound effects appropriate to the narrative - for example, a crackling fire during a scene in Baker Street where Holmes refers to the fire being lit, footsteps at the top of a page where characters make an entrance, etc. So far it hasn't been distracting. The app uses a fairly simple way for you to adjust playback speed -- I read much faster than the default pace -- and learns your speed pretty quickly.

This is essentially what I have been wanting for years, trying to do myself with carefully chosen Pandora stations (note: it rarely works, except occasionally for Jane Austen), and which certain audiobooks like The Golden Compass and Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell alllllmost have for bits of their audible files. But not the whole way through - and not as a soundtrack to something you read yourself.

In general I prefer to read books myself rather than listen to an audio (though the narrator of the Jonathan Strange audio is one of the few that I prefer to my own mental voice), so having this Booktrack option is amazing. There are some little glitchy things in the app, but hey, it's new; and I wish they had more titles available. But I think it's a fantastic start and I am so excited to downloading more as they become available!

Monday, September 5, 2011

Trader Joe's Vegan Products list

Trader Joe's: List of Vegan Products

Handy webpage for future reference!

'via Blog this'

Thoughts on Neil Gaiman's writing style

Originally posted 23 Oct. 2008, at the old version of Stored Thought on LJ.


There is a quality of Neil Gaiman's writing which I have been struggling to identify for some time now (like, since I started reading his books, really), and finally, after all these years, and through discussing it with my mother, I think I've figured it out.

There is a quality of self-consciousness, an almost emotionless, nonchalant, 'aren't I clever?' sense, to all of his writing - his short stories, his longer works of fiction, his graphic novels, his blog posts, his book-signing-tour talks, his introductions to other people's stories. You can see the construction, the assembly behind it. It's a quality my mother described as arrogant, and I called teenaged -- neither of them meant as an insult (both my mother and I are big Gaiman fans), but both seem to apply. Something about his writing feels a little smug, a little affected. It's kind of a pose, and not in the tongue-in-cheek, wryly ironic way that Stephen Fry or Oscar Wilde are posed and affected, but in an unavoidable way. With Fry or Wilde, you get this feeling that they're in on the joke, and it's all done with a twinkle in the eye or, at least, tongue firmly in slightly cynical cheek. Douglas Adams, too, has a little of this quality, but in his writing it always accompanied by a sort of reckless, wild bitterness that my mother described as him flipping off the world. In all of these cases - Adams, Fry, and Wilde - it's ironic, it's aware of the absurdity. With Neil Gaiman, it just kind of reads as too planned without being meticulous; crafted without being exquisite. You can feel him as Author just behind every word, telling you why he chose that phrase instead of another, pointing you toward the conclusions he wants you to draw, pulling the curtain back from the plot twists he wants you to be amazed at, preening himself a little all the while and saying what a clever writer he is.

Actually, now that I'm thinking more about it, I think this quality can be seen in John Steinbeck and Tad Williams, too. Now there's a random combination. But with Steinbeck, it's intermittent (very much present in East of Eden and The Pearl, and I would say entirely nonexistent in Cannery Row), and even when it's there, it's overshadowed by a vastness, an awed-ness, his own sense of quiet, ayup-esque joy in life. With Williams, it's present in his earlier works and fades away as you continue through his bibliography - with him, it's very much the product of his youth and inexperience early on, and it's delightful to watch him grow out of it, to improve, to learn both how to tighten up and to free his writing. Neil Gaiman, however, hasn't grown out of it - if anything, I would say he's just growing more into it.

But still, I like his stories. But that's just it -- I always say I like Neil Gaiman's stories, never that I like his writing. If he didn't indeed have such clever conceits (my mother may call him arrogant, but he has got something to be arrogant about, at least!), I wouldn't read him. Some authors, I would read anything they'd written, for style alone. Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, Vladimir Nabokov -- I would read a shopping list they'd written. In the case of Victor Hugo, I'm pretty sure he did include a shopping list or two in Les Miserables. (Really, who else could get you to read a history of the Paris sewage system that has absolutely nothing to do with the actual plot of his novel -- excuse me, tome?)

My point is, some authors I read for aesthetic reasons, for the sheer pleasure of the way they put words together, exquisitely crafted but seemingly effortless, and arising as though the only possible assembly of language for that story, that situation, that character, that moment. You just savor the language, revel in it, and if they have intricate plots and engaging characters to boot, then so much the better. But Neil Gaiman I read solely for the plots.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

White truffle white bean hummus with mushrooms and thyme | Vegan Good Eats

White truffle white bean hummus with mushrooms and thyme | Vegan Good Eats:

'via Blog this'


I discovered Vegan Good Eats when I was googling a good vegan deviled egg recipe, and this AMAZING-sounding hummus recipe just kind of smacked in the face. I have to try it. I HAVE TO.

in related news- tonight's dinner is a baked potato with Tofutti sour cream, Earthy Balance vegan faux-butter, black pepper, green onions, tiny tiny adorable tomatoes from my dad's garden, & steamed broccoli; other dish, a cold mixing of brown rice, kidney beans, corn, red bell pepper, & onions, which tastes very very very good, altogether. I'm really into food for someone who can't cook. It's a problem.